Download Free The History of Sexuality, Volume 2: The Use of Pleasure (The History of Sexuality #2) Audio Books

Itemize Books In Favor Of The History of Sexuality, Volume 2: The Use of Pleasure (The History of Sexuality #2)

Original Title:	Histoire de la sexualité 2. l'usage des plaisirs
ISBN:	0394751221 (ISBN13: 9780394751221)
Edition Language:	English
Series:	The History of Sexuality #2

The History of Sexuality, Volume 2: The Use of Pleasure (The History of Sexuality #2)

Michel Foucault

Paperback | Pages: 304 pages

Rating: 4.07 | 3305 Users | 99 Reviews

Declare Containing Books The History of Sexuality, Volume 2: The Use of Pleasure (The History of Sexuality #2)

Title	:	The History of Sexuality, Volume 2: The Use of Pleasure (The History of Sexuality #2)
Author	:	Michel Foucault
Book Format	:	Paperback
Book Edition	:	Deluxe Edition
Pages	:	Pages: 304 pages
Published	:	1990 by Vintage (first published 1984)
Categories	:	Philosophy. Nonfiction. History. Theory. Sexuality. Sociology

Rendition In Pursuance Of Books The History of Sexuality, Volume 2: The Use of Pleasure (The History of Sexuality #2)

In this sequel to The History of Sexuality, Volume I: An Introduction, the brilliantly original French thinker who died in 1984 gives an analysis of how the ancient Greeks perceived sexuality.

Throughout The Uses of Pleasure Foucault analyzes an irresistible array of ancient Greek texts on eroticism as he tries to answer basic questions: How in the West did sexual experience become a moral issue? And why were other appetites of the body, such as hunger, and collective concerns, such as civic duty, not subjected to the numberless rules and regulations and judgments that have defined, if not confined, sexual behavior?

Rating Containing Books The History of Sexuality, Volume 2: The Use of Pleasure (The History of Sexuality #2)

Ratings: 4.07 From 3305 Users | 99 Reviews

Write Up Containing Books The History of Sexuality, Volume 2: The Use of Pleasure (The History of Sexuality #2)

This book contains interesting reflections on how subjectivity was formed in ancient Greek culture around (sexual) pleasure as a result of relations men had with oneself in terms of moderation, selfmastery, selfstylization and domination. As such, Foucault shows, the Greeks developed an ethics of the self through selfcare.A criticical note: the book contains alot of redundancy and repetition, which usually isn't the case with Foucault.What further strikes me is that Foucault doesn't give women a

Foucault answers questions I had about sex and sexuality. Conservative Christians do not want to think about the question of sexual pleasure, they are afraid of their sexuality, in particular, they are afraid of female sexuality. Conservative Christians attack Foucault for being a homosexual, they are afraid of his ideas. The best way to describe Foucault, the western world before Foucault, the western world after Foucault. Foucaults thought has heavily influence feminism. He is the most

This book broke the spell of Foucault for me. In works like he wove a net from works that were unknown to me. Who was I to question his readings?Here I finally saw him at work on an author and text I knew, and when I looked at what he did with Xenophon, I found his reading of the Oeconomicus was bizarre and tendentious. Fully escaping from Foucault would take me until but this was the start.

Foucault's continuation of his impressive History of Human Sexuality looks into the sexual mores and practices of the Ancient Greeks, and attempts to understand the development of sexuality as a moral problematic. Contrary to the conventional wisdom which posits a complete epistemic reversal from the Hellenic world to the Christian world, Foucault poses a more complex network of interconnections between the two paradigms, which lie in a valuation of asceticism. Although The Use of Pleasure is

Foucault cautions the reader of this volume right in the beginning that he is not a classicist and neither trained in the classical Greek nor Latin canon; unfortunately, this also seems quite apparent through larger parts of his textual analysis. Often times, the sources consulted for his argument seem rather random, and he gives little to no contextualization. To be fair, Foucault was never known as an acute historian but rather as an influential philosopher. Conceptually then, the volume at

Foucault is GOD

Has some important insights, but Foucault's over-reliance on Attic prose substantially weakens his arguments - note that he doesn't even mention Sappho! And he quotes from the tragedians maybe twice? There are many classicists of the past few decades who have done much better work on ancient Greek sexuality. Foucault is more interested in making a point about the world that he lived in than in actually understanding the way the Greeks lived.